What are the chances of seeing a Rufous-tailed Tailorbird in Khao Luang National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-tailed Tailorbird sighting in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, based on 188 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 57th most-seen of the 215 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous-tailed Tailorbird in Khao Luang National Park?
August
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-tailed Tailorbird in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, against about 10% in July, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous-tailed Tailorbird?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous-tailed Tailorbird sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Khao Luang National Park the best place to see a Rufous-tailed Tailorbird?
3rd of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Rufous-tailed Tailorbird sightings, Khao Luang National Park ranks 3rd at about 30%. The best odds are in Bako National Park (Malaysia, about 50%) and Way Kambas National Park (Indonesia, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Rufous-tailed Tailorbird live in Khao Luang National Park?
Same genus: Orthotomus
The closest relatives of the Rufous-tailed Tailorbird that you can see in Khao Luang National Park (genus Orthotomus, Typical Tailorbirds) are Dark-necked Tailorbird (about 50%) and Common Tailorbird (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous-tailed Tailorbird sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous-tailed Tailorbird is recorded against all the birds logged in Khao Luang National Park (188 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.