Kallima sylvia
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Danum Valley Conservation Area | 🇲🇾 Malaysia | |
| 2 | Sepilok | 🇲🇾 Malaysia | |
| 3 | Kinabatangan Wildlife Sanctuary | 🇲🇾 Malaysia | |
| 4 | Sinharaja Forest Reserve | 🇱🇰 Sri Lanka | |
| 5 | Cat Tien National Park | 🇻🇳 Vietnam | |
| 6 | Bako National Park | 🇲🇾 Malaysia | |
| 7 | Kaeng Krachan National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 8 | Khao Sok National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 9 | Kinabalu Park | 🇲🇾 Malaysia | |
| 10 | Khao Yai National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hanoi | 🇻🇳 Vietnam | |
| 2 | Kozhikode | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 3 | Ho Chi Minh City | 🇻🇳 Vietnam | |
| 4 | Kochi | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 5 | Kuala Lumpur | 🇲🇾 Malaysia | |
| 6 | Bangkok | 🇹🇭 Thailand |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Clipper sighting in Kinabalu Park on a given day, based on 17 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 63rd most-seen of the 297 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
July–August and October–January
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Clipper in Kinabalu Park on a given day, against under 5% in April and September, the lowest months.
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Clipper sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
9th of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Clipper sightings, Kinabalu Park ranks 9th at about 20%. The best odds are in Danum Valley Conservation Area (Malaysia, about 50%), Sepilok (Malaysia, about 40%) and Kinabatangan Wildlife Sanctuary (Malaysia, about 40%). All parks ranked.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Clipper is recorded against all the insects logged in Kinabalu Park (17 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
