What are the chances of seeing a Vitelline Masked-Weaver in Lake Manyara National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Vitelline Masked-Weaver sighting in Lake Manyara National Park on a given day, based on 110 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 48th most-seen of the 307 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Vitelline Masked-Weaver in Lake Manyara National Park?
April
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Vitelline Masked-Weaver in Lake Manyara National Park on a given day, against about 10% in May to October, the lowest months. That is one of Lake Manyara National Park's wettest months, with about 260 mm of rain against 15 mm in September.
What time of day is best to see a Vitelline Masked-Weaver?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Vitelline Masked-Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lake Manyara National Park the best place to see a Vitelline Masked-Weaver?
2nd of 17
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Vitelline Masked-Weaver sightings, Lake Manyara National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%. The best odds are in Mkomazi National Park (Tanzania, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Vitelline Masked-Weaver live in Lake Manyara National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Vitelline Masked-Weaver that you can see in Lake Manyara National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Lesser Masked-Weaver (about 20%), Baglafecht Weaver (about 20%) and Chestnut Weaver (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Vitelline Masked-Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Vitelline Masked-Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Lake Manyara National Park (110 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.