What are the chances of seeing a Baglafecht Weaver in Lake Manyara National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Baglafecht Weaver sighting in Lake Manyara National Park on a given day, based on 87 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 56th most-seen of the 307 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Baglafecht Weaver in Lake Manyara National Park?
February
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Baglafecht Weaver in Lake Manyara National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, the lowest month.
What time of day is best to see a Baglafecht Weaver?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Baglafecht Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lake Manyara National Park the best place to see a Baglafecht Weaver?
10th of 22
Of the 22 parks where we can rate Baglafecht Weaver sightings, Lake Manyara National Park ranks 10th at about 20%. The best odds are in Aberdare National Park (Kenya, about 60%), Volcanoes National Park (Rwanda, about 60%) and Bale Mountains National Park (Ethiopia, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Baglafecht Weaver live in Lake Manyara National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Baglafecht Weaver that you can see in Lake Manyara National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Vitelline Masked-Weaver (about 20%), Lesser Masked-Weaver (about 20%) and Chestnut Weaver (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Baglafecht Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Baglafecht Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Lake Manyara National Park (87 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.