Cyclocephala signaticollis
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Royal National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Blue Mountains National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 3 | Lamington National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sydney | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Melbourne | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 3 | Brisbane | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 4 | Buenos Aires | 🇦🇷 Argentina |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Argentinian Scarab sighting in Lamington National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 179th most-seen of the 430 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
November
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report an Argentinian Scarab in Lamington National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–March and May–October, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Argentinian Scarab sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
3rd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Argentinian Scarab sightings, Lamington National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Royal National Park (Australia, about 20%) and Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, about 20%).
Same family: Scarabaeidae
The closest relatives of the Argentinian Scarab that you can see in Lamington National Park (family Scarabaeidae, Scarabs) are Campfire Beetle (about 10%), Granny Smith Beetle (about 10%) and Australian Rhinoceros Beetle (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Argentinian Scarab is recorded against all the insects logged in Lamington National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
