Torbia viridissima
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Grampians National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Springbrook National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 3 | Lamington National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 4 | Great Otway National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Gumleaf Katydid sighting in Lamington National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 263rd most-seen of the 430 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
March
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Gumleaf Katydid in Lamington National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to January, the lowest months. That is one of Lamington National Park's wettest months, with about 150 mm of rain against 40 mm in August.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Gumleaf Katydid sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Gumleaf Katydid sightings, Lamington National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Grampians National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Springbrook National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Same family: Tettigoniidae
The closest relatives of the Gumleaf Katydid that you can see in Lamington National Park (family Tettigoniidae, Katydids) are Naskrecki's Bush Katydid (about 10%), Southern Spiny Forest Katydid (about 10%) and 32-Spotted Katydid (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Gumleaf Katydid is recorded against all the insects logged in Lamington National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
