Tenagogerris euphrosyne
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Royal National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Lamington National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 3 | Blue Mountains National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 4 | Springbrook National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Tenagogerris euphrosyne sighting in Lamington National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 263rd most-seen of the 430 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Tenagogerris euphrosyne in Lamington National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, April and June–November, the lowest months. That is one of Lamington National Park's wettest months, with about 160 mm of rain against 40 mm in August.
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Tenagogerris euphrosyne sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Tenagogerris euphrosyne sightings, Lamington National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Royal National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Same order: Hemiptera
The closest relatives of the Tenagogerris euphrosyne that you can see in Lamington National Park (order Hemiptera, True Bugs, Hoppers, Aphids, and allies) are Razor Grinder (about 20%), Small Bottle Cicada (about 20%) and Lychee Stink Bug (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Tenagogerris euphrosyne is recorded against all the insects logged in Lamington National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
