What are the chances of seeing a White-cheecked Hill Partridge in Manas National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a White-cheecked Hill Partridge sighting in Manas National Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 326th most-seen of the 377 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a White-cheecked Hill Partridge in Manas National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a White-cheecked Hill Partridge in Manas National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a White-cheecked Hill Partridge?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most White-cheecked Hill Partridge sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manas National Park the best place to see a White-cheecked Hill Partridge?
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate White-cheecked Hill Partridge sightings, Manas National Park ranks 2nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Namdapha National Park (India, about 10%).
Which relatives of the White-cheecked Hill Partridge live in Manas National Park?
Same family: Phasianidae
The closest relatives of the White-cheecked Hill Partridge that you can see in Manas National Park (family Phasianidae, Pheasants, Grouse, and Allies) are Common Peafowl (about 60%), Red Junglefowl (about 50%) and Kalij Pheasant (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the White-cheecked Hill Partridge sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White-cheecked Hill Partridge is recorded against all the birds logged in Manas National Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.