What are the chances of seeing a Black-backed Grosbeak in Manu National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-backed Grosbeak sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 14 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 575th most-seen of the 641 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-backed Grosbeak in Manu National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-backed Grosbeak in Manu National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Black-backed Grosbeak?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-backed Grosbeak sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manu National Park the best place to see a Black-backed Grosbeak?
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Black-backed Grosbeak sightings, Manu National Park ranks 4th at under 5%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Amboró National Park (Bolivia, under 5%), El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, under 5%) and Chingaza National Natural Park (Colombia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Black-backed Grosbeak live in Manu National Park?
Same family: Cardinalidae
The closest relatives of the Black-backed Grosbeak that you can see in Manu National Park (family Cardinalidae, Cardinals and Allies) are Red-crowned Ant-Tanager (about 10%) and Amazonian Grosbeak (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-backed Grosbeak sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-backed Grosbeak is recorded against all the birds logged in Manu National Park (14 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.