What are the chances of seeing an Ovampo Sparrowhawk in Meru National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Ovampo Sparrowhawk sighting in Meru National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 231st most-seen of the 243 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Ovampo Sparrowhawk in Meru National Park?
November
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Ovampo Sparrowhawk in Meru National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June, September–October and December–April, the lowest months. That is one of Meru National Park's wettest months, with about 200 mm of rain against almost none in July. May and July–August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see an Ovampo Sparrowhawk?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ovampo Sparrowhawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Meru National Park the best place to see an Ovampo Sparrowhawk?
Yes
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Ovampo Sparrowhawk sightings, Meru National Park has the highest daily chance: under 5%. Next come Hwange National Park (Zimbabwe, under 5%) and Arusha National Park (Tanzania, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Ovampo Sparrowhawk live in Meru National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Ovampo Sparrowhawk that you can see in Meru National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Bateleur (about 50%), Eastern Chanting-Goshawk (about 50%) and Tawny Eagle (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ovampo Sparrowhawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ovampo Sparrowhawk is recorded against all the birds logged in Meru National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.