What are the chances of seeing a Paris Peacock Swallowtail in Namdapha National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Paris Peacock Swallowtail sighting in Namdapha National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 39th most-seen of the 71 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Paris Peacock Swallowtail in Namdapha National Park?
April and October
In those months about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Paris Peacock Swallowtail in Namdapha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in December, the lowest month. June to August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Paris Peacock Swallowtail?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Paris Peacock Swallowtail sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Namdapha National Park the best place to see a Paris Peacock Swallowtail?
Among the best
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Paris Peacock Swallowtail sightings, Namdapha National Park ranks 2nd at about 40%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Khao Yai National Park (Thailand, about 40%).
Which relatives of the Paris Peacock Swallowtail live in Namdapha National Park?
Same genus: Papilio
The closest relatives of the Paris Peacock Swallowtail that you can see in Namdapha National Park (genus Papilio, Common Swallowtails) are Red Helen Swallowtail (about 40%) and Spangle Swallowtail (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Paris Peacock Swallowtail sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Paris Peacock Swallowtail is recorded against all the insects logged in Namdapha National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.