What are the chances of seeing a Kalahari Tree Skink in Namib-Naukluft National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Kalahari Tree Skink sighting in Namib-Naukluft National Park on a given day, based on 52 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 8th most-seen of the 39 reptiles we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Kalahari Tree Skink in Namib-Naukluft National Park?
April
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Kalahari Tree Skink in Namib-Naukluft National Park on a given day, against about 20% in January–February, June and September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Kalahari Tree Skink?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Kalahari Tree Skink sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Namib-Naukluft National Park the best place to see a Kalahari Tree Skink?
3rd of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Kalahari Tree Skink sightings, Namib-Naukluft National Park ranks 3rd at about 30%. The best odds are in Waterberg Plateau Park (Namibia, about 60%) and Etosha National Park (Namibia, about 40%).
Which relatives of the Kalahari Tree Skink live in Namib-Naukluft National Park?
Same genus: Trachylepis
The closest relatives of the Kalahari Tree Skink that you can see in Namib-Naukluft National Park (genus Trachylepis, Afro-Malagasy Mabuyas) are Variegated Skink (about 20%), Western three-striped skink (about 20%) and Sharp-lipped Mabuya (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Kalahari Tree Skink sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Kalahari Tree Skink is recorded against all the reptiles logged in Namib-Naukluft National Park (52 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.