What are the chances of seeing a Broad-billed Flycatcher in Nitmiluk National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Broad-billed Flycatcher sighting in Nitmiluk National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 96th most-seen of the 103 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Broad-billed Flycatcher in Nitmiluk National Park?
August
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Broad-billed Flycatcher in Nitmiluk National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to July, the lowest months. That is one of Nitmiluk National Park's driest months, with almost no rain against 270 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see a Broad-billed Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Broad-billed Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Nitmiluk National Park the best place to see a Broad-billed Flycatcher?
2nd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Broad-billed Flycatcher sightings, Nitmiluk National Park ranks 2nd at under 5%. The best odds are in Kakadu National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Broad-billed Flycatcher live in Nitmiluk National Park?
Same genus: Myiagra
The closest relatives of the Broad-billed Flycatcher that you can see in Nitmiluk National Park (genus Myiagra, Myiagra Flycatchers) are Leaden Flycatcher (about 40%), Paperbark Flycatcher (about 20%) and Shining Flycatcher (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Broad-billed Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Broad-billed Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Nitmiluk National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.