What are the chances of seeing a Fig Tree Borer in Ostional Wildlife Refuge?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Fig Tree Borer sighting in Ostional Wildlife Refuge on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 32nd most-seen of the 47 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Fig Tree Borer in Ostional Wildlife Refuge?
February and December
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Fig Tree Borer in Ostional Wildlife Refuge on a given day, against under 5% in March and May–October, the lowest months. Those are among Ostional Wildlife Refuge's driest months, with about 50 mm of rain a month against 560 mm in October.
What time of day is best to see a Fig Tree Borer?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Fig Tree Borer sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Ostional Wildlife Refuge the best place to see a Fig Tree Borer?
3rd of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Fig Tree Borer sightings, Ostional Wildlife Refuge ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Palo Verde National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%) and Tayrona National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Fig Tree Borer live in Ostional Wildlife Refuge?
Same order: Coleoptera
The closest relatives of the Fig Tree Borer that you can see in Ostional Wildlife Refuge (order Coleoptera, Beetles) are Coelosis biloba (about 10%), Calligrapha argus (about 10%) and Calligrapha fulvipes (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Fig Tree Borer sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Fig Tree Borer is recorded against all the insects logged in Ostional Wildlife Refuge (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.