What are the chances of seeing a Masked Mountain-Tanager in Podocarpus National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Masked Mountain-Tanager sighting in Podocarpus National Park on a given day, based on 27 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 294th most-seen of the 446 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Masked Mountain-Tanager in Podocarpus National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Masked Mountain-Tanager in Podocarpus National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Masked Mountain-Tanager?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Masked Mountain-Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Podocarpus National Park the best place to see a Masked Mountain-Tanager?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Masked Mountain-Tanager sightings, Podocarpus National Park has the highest daily chance: under 5%. Next come Los Nevados National Natural Park (Colombia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Masked Mountain-Tanager live in Podocarpus National Park?
Same family: Thraupidae
The closest relatives of the Masked Mountain-Tanager that you can see in Podocarpus National Park (family Thraupidae, Tanagers and Allies) are Lacrimose Mountain-Tanager (about 40%), Masked Flowerpiercer (about 40%) and Blue-necked Tanager (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Masked Mountain-Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Masked Mountain-Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Podocarpus National Park (27 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.