What are the chances of seeing a Green-and-gold Tanager in Podocarpus National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Green-and-gold Tanager sighting in Podocarpus National Park on a given day, based on 532 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 18th most-seen of the 446 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Green-and-gold Tanager in Podocarpus National Park?
July and September
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Green-and-gold Tanager in Podocarpus National Park on a given day, against about 20% in March, May and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Green-and-gold Tanager?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Green-and-gold Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Podocarpus National Park the best place to see a Green-and-gold Tanager?
Yes
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Green-and-gold Tanager sightings, Podocarpus National Park has the highest daily chance: about 30%. Next come Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 20%) and Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Green-and-gold Tanager live in Podocarpus National Park?
Same genus: Tangara
The closest relatives of the Green-and-gold Tanager that you can see in Podocarpus National Park (genus Tangara, Tangara Tanagers) are Paradise Tanager (about 30%), Blue-and-black Tanager (about 30%) and Bay-headed Tanager (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Green-and-gold Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Green-and-gold Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Podocarpus National Park (532 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.