What are the chances of seeing a White-crowned Tapaculo in Podocarpus National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a White-crowned Tapaculo sighting in Podocarpus National Park on a given day, based on 187 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 103rd most-seen of the 446 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a White-crowned Tapaculo in Podocarpus National Park?
May and September–October
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a White-crowned Tapaculo in Podocarpus National Park on a given day, against about 10% in June–August and November–April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a White-crowned Tapaculo?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most White-crowned Tapaculo sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Podocarpus National Park the best place to see a White-crowned Tapaculo?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate White-crowned Tapaculo sightings, Podocarpus National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Los Nevados National Natural Park (Colombia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the White-crowned Tapaculo live in Podocarpus National Park?
Same genus: Scytalopus
The closest relatives of the White-crowned Tapaculo that you can see in Podocarpus National Park (genus Scytalopus, Scytalopus Tapaculos) are Chusquea Tapaculo (about 30%), Blackish Tapaculo (about 10%) and Loja Tapaculo (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the White-crowned Tapaculo sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White-crowned Tapaculo is recorded against all the birds logged in Podocarpus National Park (187 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.