What are the chances of seeing a Red-Underwing Skipper in Pyrénées National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Red-Underwing Skipper sighting in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, based on 37 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 255th most-seen of the 1277 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-Underwing Skipper in Pyrénées National Park?
May
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Red-Underwing Skipper in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July–August and October–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Red-Underwing Skipper?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-Underwing Skipper sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Pyrénées National Park the best place to see a Red-Underwing Skipper?
Among the best
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Red-Underwing Skipper sightings, Pyrénées National Park ranks 5th at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Mercantour National Park (France, about 10%), Sierra Nevada National Park (Spain, about 10%) and Cévennes National Park (France, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Red-Underwing Skipper live in Pyrénées National Park?
Same family: Hesperiidae
The closest relatives of the Red-Underwing Skipper that you can see in Pyrénées National Park (family Hesperiidae, Skippers) are Far Eastern Large Skipper (about 20%), Common Branded Skipper (about 20%) and Dingy Skipper (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-Underwing Skipper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-Underwing Skipper is recorded against all the insects logged in Pyrénées National Park (37 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.