What are the chances of seeing a Scarce Crimson And Gold in Pyrénées National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Scarce Crimson And Gold sighting in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 738th most-seen of the 1277 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Scarce Crimson And Gold in Pyrénées National Park?
April–June and September
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Scarce Crimson And Gold in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July–August and October–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Scarce Crimson And Gold?
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Scarce Crimson And Gold sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Pyrénées National Park the best place to see a Scarce Crimson And Gold?
5th of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Scarce Crimson And Gold sightings, Pyrénées National Park ranks 5th at under 5%. The best odds are in Sierra Nevada National Park (Spain, about 10%), Mercantour National Park (France, about 10%) and Cévennes National Park (France, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Scarce Crimson And Gold live in Pyrénées National Park?
Same genus: Pyrausta
The closest relatives of the Scarce Crimson And Gold that you can see in Pyrénées National Park (genus Pyrausta, Mint Moths) are Straw-Barred Pearl (about 10%), Common Crimson-And-Gold Moth (about 10%) and Mint Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Scarce Crimson And Gold sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Scarce Crimson And Gold is recorded against all the insects logged in Pyrénées National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.