What are the chances of seeing a Tree-Lichen Beauty in Pyrénées National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Tree-Lichen Beauty sighting in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 869th most-seen of the 1277 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Tree-Lichen Beauty in Pyrénées National Park?
August
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Tree-Lichen Beauty in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to July, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Tree-Lichen Beauty?
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Tree-Lichen Beauty sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Pyrénées National Park the best place to see a Tree-Lichen Beauty?
4th of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Tree-Lichen Beauty sightings, Pyrénées National Park ranks 4th at under 5%. The best odds are in Bavarian Forest National Park (Germany, about 10%), Cévennes National Park (France, about 10%) and Wadden Sea National Park (Germany, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Tree-Lichen Beauty live in Pyrénées National Park?
Same family: Noctuidae
The closest relatives of the Tree-Lichen Beauty that you can see in Pyrénées National Park (family Noctuidae, Cutworm Moths and Allies) are Silver Υ (about 10%), Cotton Bollworm Moth (about 10%) and Marbled White-Spot (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Tree-Lichen Beauty sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Tree-Lichen Beauty is recorded against all the insects logged in Pyrénées National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.