What are the chances of seeing a Stout Cisticola in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Stout Cisticola sighting in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, based on 141 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 164th most-seen of the 434 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Stout Cisticola in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
August
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Stout Cisticola in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February and April–May, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Stout Cisticola?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Stout Cisticola sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Queen Elizabeth National Park the best place to see a Stout Cisticola?
4th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Stout Cisticola sightings, Queen Elizabeth National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Nairobi National Park (Kenya, about 20%), Masai Mara National Reserve (Kenya, about 20%) and Akagera National Park (Rwanda, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Stout Cisticola live in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Same genus: Cisticola
The closest relatives of the Stout Cisticola that you can see in Queen Elizabeth National Park (genus Cisticola, Cisticolas) are Zitting Cisticola (about 30%), Croaking Cisticola (about 20%) and Trilling Cisticola (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Stout Cisticola sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Stout Cisticola is recorded against all the birds logged in Queen Elizabeth National Park (141 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.