What are the chances of seeing a Chubb's Cisticola in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chubb's Cisticola sighting in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 395th most-seen of the 434 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chubb's Cisticola in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chubb's Cisticola in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Chubb's Cisticola?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chubb's Cisticola sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Queen Elizabeth National Park the best place to see a Chubb's Cisticola?
7th of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Chubb's Cisticola sightings, Queen Elizabeth National Park ranks 7th at under 5%. The best odds are in Volcanoes National Park (Rwanda, about 80%), Nyungwe National Park (Rwanda, about 70%) and Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (Uganda, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Chubb's Cisticola live in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Same genus: Cisticola
The closest relatives of the Chubb's Cisticola that you can see in Queen Elizabeth National Park (genus Cisticola, Cisticolas) are Zitting Cisticola (about 30%), Croaking Cisticola (about 20%) and Trilling Cisticola (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chubb's Cisticola sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chubb's Cisticola is recorded against all the birds logged in Queen Elizabeth National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.