What are the chances of seeing a Trilling Cisticola in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Trilling Cisticola sighting in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, based on 301 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 94th most-seen of the 434 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Trilling Cisticola in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
July and November
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Trilling Cisticola in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, against about 10% in April and December–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Trilling Cisticola?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Trilling Cisticola sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Queen Elizabeth National Park the best place to see a Trilling Cisticola?
4th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Trilling Cisticola sightings, Queen Elizabeth National Park ranks 4th at about 20%. The best odds are in Lake Mburo National Park (Uganda, about 60%), Arusha National Park (Tanzania, about 50%) and Akagera National Park (Rwanda, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Trilling Cisticola live in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Same genus: Cisticola
The closest relatives of the Trilling Cisticola that you can see in Queen Elizabeth National Park (genus Cisticola, Cisticolas) are Zitting Cisticola (about 30%), Croaking Cisticola (about 20%) and Winding Cisticola (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Trilling Cisticola sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Trilling Cisticola is recorded against all the birds logged in Queen Elizabeth National Park (301 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.