What are the chances of seeing a Green Coprosma Carpet in Rakiura National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Green Coprosma Carpet sighting in Rakiura National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 103rd most-seen of the 118 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Green Coprosma Carpet in Rakiura National Park?
May–June and October
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Green Coprosma Carpet in Rakiura National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–April, July–September and November–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Green Coprosma Carpet?
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Green Coprosma Carpet sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Rakiura National Park the best place to see a Green Coprosma Carpet?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Green Coprosma Carpet sightings, Rakiura National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Fiordland National Park (New Zealand, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Green Coprosma Carpet live in Rakiura National Park?
Same genus: Austrocidaria
The closest relatives of the Green Coprosma Carpet that you can see in Rakiura National Park (genus Austrocidaria) are Dark Coprosma Carpet (about 20%) and Barred Coprosma Carpet (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Green Coprosma Carpet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Green Coprosma Carpet is recorded against all the insects logged in Rakiura National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.