What are the chances of seeing a Streak-throated Swallow in Ranthambore National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Streak-throated Swallow sighting in Ranthambore National Park on a given day, based on 46 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 161st most-seen of the 251 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Streak-throated Swallow in Ranthambore National Park?
May, August, October and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Streak-throated Swallow in Ranthambore National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–April, June–July, September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Streak-throated Swallow?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Streak-throated Swallow sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Ranthambore National Park the best place to see a Streak-throated Swallow?
3rd of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Streak-throated Swallow sightings, Ranthambore National Park ranks 3rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Keoladeo National Park (India, about 10%) and Gir National Park (India, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Streak-throated Swallow live in Ranthambore National Park?
Same family: Hirundinidae
The closest relatives of the Streak-throated Swallow that you can see in Ranthambore National Park (family Hirundinidae, Swallows and Martins) are Dusky Crag Martin (about 20%), Gray-throated Martin (about 20%) and Wire-tailed Swallow (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Streak-throated Swallow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Streak-throated Swallow is recorded against all the birds logged in Ranthambore National Park (46 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.