What are the chances of seeing a Rusty Sparrow in Rincón de la Vieja National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rusty Sparrow sighting in Rincón de la Vieja National Park on a given day, based on 27 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 225th most-seen of the 341 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rusty Sparrow in Rincón de la Vieja National Park?
May–June and September
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rusty Sparrow in Rincón de la Vieja National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July–August and October–April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Rusty Sparrow?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rusty Sparrow sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Rincón de la Vieja National Park the best place to see a Rusty Sparrow?
7th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Rusty Sparrow sightings, Rincón de la Vieja National Park ranks 7th at under 5%. The best odds are in Cusuco National Park (Honduras, about 20%), Celaque National Park (Honduras, about 20%) and La Tigra National Park (Honduras, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Rusty Sparrow live in Rincón de la Vieja National Park?
Same family: Passerellidae
The closest relatives of the Rusty Sparrow that you can see in Rincón de la Vieja National Park (family Passerellidae, New World Sparrows) are Stripe-headed Sparrow (about 30%), Olive Sparrow (about 10%) and Orange-billed Sparrow (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rusty Sparrow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rusty Sparrow is recorded against all the birds logged in Rincón de la Vieja National Park (27 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.