What are the chances of seeing a Peacock Pansy in Royal Bardia National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Peacock Pansy sighting in Royal Bardia National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 5th most-seen of the 14 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Peacock Pansy in Royal Bardia National Park?
February and July
In those months about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Peacock Pansy in Royal Bardia National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May and October, the lowest months. Those are among Royal Bardia National Park's wettest months, with about 310 mm of rain a month against almost none in November. August has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Peacock Pansy?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Peacock Pansy sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Royal Bardia National Park the best place to see a Peacock Pansy?
Among the best
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Peacock Pansy sightings, Royal Bardia National Park ranks 2nd at about 30%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Keoladeo National Park (India, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Peacock Pansy live in Royal Bardia National Park?
Same genus: Junonia
The closest relatives of the Peacock Pansy that you can see in Royal Bardia National Park (genus Junonia, Buckeyes & Pansies) are Chocolate Pansy (about 30%) and Grey Pansy (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Peacock Pansy sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Peacock Pansy is recorded against all the insects logged in Royal Bardia National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.