What are the chances of seeing a Common Raven Butterfly in Royal Manas National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Common Raven Butterfly sighting in Royal Manas National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 12th most-seen of the 27 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Raven Butterfly in Royal Manas National Park?
May
In that month about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Common Raven Butterfly in Royal Manas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, the lowest month. July to October have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Common Raven Butterfly?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Raven Butterfly sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Royal Manas National Park the best place to see a Common Raven Butterfly?
Yes
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Common Raven Butterfly sightings, Royal Manas National Park has the highest daily chance: about 30%. Next come Manas National Park (India, about 20%) and Kaeng Krachan National Park (Thailand, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Common Raven Butterfly live in Royal Manas National Park?
Same genus: Papilio
The closest relatives of the Common Raven Butterfly that you can see in Royal Manas National Park (genus Papilio, Common Swallowtails) are Paris Peacock Swallowtail (about 30%) and Common Mormon Swallowtail (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Raven Butterfly sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Raven Butterfly is recorded against all the insects logged in Royal Manas National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.