What are the chances of seeing a Paris Peacock Swallowtail in Royal Manas National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Paris Peacock Swallowtail sighting in Royal Manas National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 12th most-seen of the 27 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Paris Peacock Swallowtail in Royal Manas National Park?
April
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Paris Peacock Swallowtail in Royal Manas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, the lowest month. July to October have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Paris Peacock Swallowtail?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Paris Peacock Swallowtail sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Royal Manas National Park the best place to see a Paris Peacock Swallowtail?
3rd of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Paris Peacock Swallowtail sightings, Royal Manas National Park ranks 3rd at about 30%. The best odds are in Khao Yai National Park (Thailand, about 40%) and Namdapha National Park (India, about 40%).
Which relatives of the Paris Peacock Swallowtail live in Royal Manas National Park?
Same genus: Papilio
The closest relatives of the Paris Peacock Swallowtail that you can see in Royal Manas National Park (genus Papilio, Common Swallowtails) are Common Raven Butterfly (about 30%) and Common Mormon Swallowtail (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Paris Peacock Swallowtail sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Paris Peacock Swallowtail is recorded against all the insects logged in Royal Manas National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.