What are the chances of seeing a Common Bluebottle in Royal Manas National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Common Bluebottle sighting in Royal Manas National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 17th most-seen of the 27 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Bluebottle in Royal Manas National Park?
May
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Common Bluebottle in Royal Manas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, the lowest month. July to October have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Common Bluebottle?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Bluebottle sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Royal Manas National Park the best place to see a Common Bluebottle?
7th of 14
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Common Bluebottle sightings, Royal Manas National Park ranks 7th at about 30%. The best odds are in Namdapha National Park (India, about 40%), Cuc Phuong National Park (Vietnam, about 30%) and Khao Yai National Park (Thailand, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Common Bluebottle live in Royal Manas National Park?
Same family: Papilionidae
The closest relatives of the Common Bluebottle that you can see in Royal Manas National Park (family Papilionidae, Swallowtails and Parnassians) are Paris Peacock Swallowtail (about 30%), Common Raven Butterfly (about 30%) and Common Mormon Swallowtail (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Bluebottle sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Bluebottle is recorded against all the insects logged in Royal Manas National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.