What are the chances of seeing a Grey Peacock-Pheasant in Royal Manas National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Grey Peacock-Pheasant sighting in Royal Manas National Park on a given day, based on 124 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 136th most-seen of the 388 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Grey Peacock-Pheasant in Royal Manas National Park?
July and November–May
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Grey Peacock-Pheasant in Royal Manas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June and October, the lowest months. August and September have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Grey Peacock-Pheasant?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Grey Peacock-Pheasant sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Royal Manas National Park the best place to see a Grey Peacock-Pheasant?
3rd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Grey Peacock-Pheasant sightings, Royal Manas National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Namdapha National Park (India, about 30%) and Kaeng Krachan National Park (Thailand, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Grey Peacock-Pheasant live in Royal Manas National Park?
Same family: Phasianidae
The closest relatives of the Grey Peacock-Pheasant that you can see in Royal Manas National Park (family Phasianidae, Pheasants, Grouse, and Allies) are Red Junglefowl (about 30%), Kalij Pheasant (about 30%) and Rufous-throated Hill Partridge (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Grey Peacock-Pheasant sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Grey Peacock-Pheasant is recorded against all the birds logged in Royal Manas National Park (124 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.