What are the chances of seeing a Raquet-tailed Roller in Ruaha National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Raquet-tailed Roller sighting in Ruaha National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 249th most-seen of the 276 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Raquet-tailed Roller in Ruaha National Park?
April, August and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Raquet-tailed Roller in Ruaha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–July, September–October and December–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Raquet-tailed Roller?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Raquet-tailed Roller sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Ruaha National Park the best place to see a Raquet-tailed Roller?
6th of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Raquet-tailed Roller sightings, Ruaha National Park ranks 6th at under 5%. The best odds are in Mikumi National Park (Tanzania, about 20%), Hwange National Park (Zimbabwe, about 10%) and Liwonde National Park (Malawi, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Raquet-tailed Roller live in Ruaha National Park?
Same genus: Coracias
The closest relatives of the Raquet-tailed Roller that you can see in Ruaha National Park (genus Coracias, Typical Rollers) are Lilac-breasted Roller (about 70%), Rufous-crowned Roller (about 30%) and European Roller (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Raquet-tailed Roller sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Raquet-tailed Roller is recorded against all the birds logged in Ruaha National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.