What are the chances of seeing a Woodland Kingfisher in Ruaha National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Woodland Kingfisher sighting in Ruaha National Park on a given day, based on 44 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 103rd most-seen of the 276 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Woodland Kingfisher in Ruaha National Park?
May
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Woodland Kingfisher in Ruaha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September, the lowest month. That is one of Ruaha National Park's driest months, with about 10 mm of rain against 180 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see a Woodland Kingfisher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Woodland Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Ruaha National Park the best place to see a Woodland Kingfisher?
13th of 35
Of the 35 parks where we can rate Woodland Kingfisher sightings, Ruaha National Park ranks 13th at about 20%. The best odds are in Semuliki National Park (Uganda, about 70%), Lake Mburo National Park (Uganda, about 60%) and Akagera National Park (Rwanda, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Woodland Kingfisher live in Ruaha National Park?
Same genus: Halcyon
The closest relatives of the Woodland Kingfisher that you can see in Ruaha National Park (genus Halcyon, Typical Woodland Kingfishers) are Gray-headed Kingfisher (about 10%) and Brown-hooded Kingfisher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Woodland Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Woodland Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Ruaha National Park (44 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.