What are the chances of seeing a Pied Kingfisher in Ruaha National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Kingfisher sighting in Ruaha National Park on a given day, based on 110 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 33rd most-seen of the 276 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Pied Kingfisher in Ruaha National Park?
September
In that month about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Pied Kingfisher in Ruaha National Park on a given day, against about 30% in April, June, October and December–February, the lowest months. That is one of Ruaha National Park's driest months, with almost no rain against 180 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see a Pied Kingfisher?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Pied Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Ruaha National Park the best place to see a Pied Kingfisher?
20th of 67
Of the 67 parks where we can rate Pied Kingfisher sightings, Ruaha National Park ranks 20th at about 40%. The best odds are in Liwonde National Park (Malawi, about 70%), Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal, about 70%) and Gonarezhou National Park (Zimbabwe, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Pied Kingfisher live in Ruaha National Park?
Same family: Alcedinidae
The closest relatives of the Pied Kingfisher that you can see in Ruaha National Park (family Alcedinidae, Kingfishers) are Woodland Kingfisher (about 20%), Giant Kingfisher (about 20%) and Gray-headed Kingfisher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Pied Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Pied Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Ruaha National Park (110 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.