What are the chances of seeing a Black-necked Weaver in Serengeti National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-necked Weaver sighting in Serengeti National Park on a given day, based on 45 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 326th most-seen of the 469 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-necked Weaver in Serengeti National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-necked Weaver in Serengeti National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Black-necked Weaver?
Between 5 and 8 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-necked Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Serengeti National Park the best place to see a Black-necked Weaver?
16th of 19
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Black-necked Weaver sightings, Serengeti National Park ranks 16th at under 5%. The best odds are in Kibale National Park (Uganda, about 40%), Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (Uganda, about 30%) and Mkomazi National Park (Tanzania, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Black-necked Weaver live in Serengeti National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Black-necked Weaver that you can see in Serengeti National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Lesser Masked-Weaver (about 20%), Vitelline Masked-Weaver (about 20%) and Village Weaver (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-necked Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-necked Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Serengeti National Park (45 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.