What are the chances of seeing a Holub's Golden-Weaver in Serengeti National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Holub's Golden-Weaver sighting in Serengeti National Park on a given day, based on 28 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 347th most-seen of the 469 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Holub's Golden-Weaver in Serengeti National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Holub's Golden-Weaver in Serengeti National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Holub's Golden-Weaver?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Holub's Golden-Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Serengeti National Park the best place to see a Holub's Golden-Weaver?
21st of 24
Of the 24 parks where we can rate Holub's Golden-Weaver sightings, Serengeti National Park ranks 21st at under 5%. The best odds are in Lake Mburo National Park (Uganda, about 20%), Nairobi National Park (Kenya, about 20%) and Akagera National Park (Rwanda, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Holub's Golden-Weaver live in Serengeti National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Holub's Golden-Weaver that you can see in Serengeti National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Lesser Masked-Weaver (about 20%), Vitelline Masked-Weaver (about 20%) and Village Weaver (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Holub's Golden-Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Holub's Golden-Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Serengeti National Park (28 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.