Chlorophorus trifasciatus
In 3 days ~50% in a week ~80%
Chlorophorus trifasciatus is a species of longhorn beetle. It can be found on oak trees near the Mediterranean Basin. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sierra Nevada National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 2 | Cévennes National Park | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 3 | Sierra de Guadarrama National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 4 | Pyrénées National Park | 🇫🇷 France |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Chlorophorus trifasciatus sighting in Sierra Nevada National Park on a given day, based on 36 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 39th most-seen of the 479 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
June and July
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Chlorophorus trifasciatus in Sierra Nevada National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April and September–February, the lowest months.
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chlorophorus trifasciatus sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Yes
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Chlorophorus trifasciatus sightings, Sierra Nevada National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Cévennes National Park (France, about 10%) and Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (Spain, about 10%).
Same family: Cerambycidae
The closest relatives of the Chlorophorus trifasciatus that you can see in Sierra Nevada National Park (family Cerambycidae, Longhorn Beetles) are Fairy-Ring Longhorn Beetle (about 20%), Stenopterus ater (about 20%) and Stictoleptura otini (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chlorophorus trifasciatus is recorded against all the insects logged in Sierra Nevada National Park (36 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
