What are the chances of seeing a Fruit Tree Borer in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Fruit Tree Borer sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 262nd most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Fruit Tree Borer in Springbrook National Park?
October and November
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Fruit Tree Borer in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January to September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Fruit Tree Borer?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Fruit Tree Borer sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Springbrook National Park the best place to see a Fruit Tree Borer?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Fruit Tree Borer sightings, Springbrook National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Great Otway National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Fruit Tree Borer live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Xyloryctidae
The closest relatives of the Fruit Tree Borer that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Xyloryctidae, Timber Moths) are Cryptophasa flavolineata (about 10%), Cryptophasa rubescens (about 10%) and Small Fruit Tree Borer (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Fruit Tree Borer sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Fruit Tree Borer is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.