What are the chances of seeing a Macleay's Swallowtail in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Macleay's Swallowtail sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 203rd most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Macleay's Swallowtail in Springbrook National Park?
January
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Macleay's Swallowtail in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February and April–October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Macleay's Swallowtail?
Between 1 and 4 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Macleay's Swallowtail sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Springbrook National Park the best place to see a Macleay's Swallowtail?
5th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Macleay's Swallowtail sightings, Springbrook National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Cradle Mountain-Lake St Clair National Park (Australia, about 20%), Lamington National Park (Australia, about 20%) and Kosciuszko National Park (Australia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Macleay's Swallowtail live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Papilionidae
The closest relatives of the Macleay's Swallowtail that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Papilionidae, Swallowtails and Parnassians) are Orchard Swallowtail (about 20%) and Richmond Birdwing (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Macleay's Swallowtail sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Macleay's Swallowtail is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.