What are the chances of seeing a Four-Spotted Footman in Triglav National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Four-Spotted Footman sighting in Triglav National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 155th most-seen of the 260 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Four-Spotted Footman in Triglav National Park?
July–August and October
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Four-Spotted Footman in Triglav National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September and November–June, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Four-Spotted Footman?
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Four-Spotted Footman sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Triglav National Park the best place to see a Four-Spotted Footman?
5th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Four-Spotted Footman sightings, Triglav National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Aigüestortes National Park (Spain, about 20%), Ordesa y Monte Perdido National Park (Spain, about 20%) and Cévennes National Park (France, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Four-Spotted Footman live in Triglav National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Four-Spotted Footman that you can see in Triglav National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Nine-Spotted Moth (about 40%), Jersey Tiger (about 30%) and Scarlet Tiger (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Four-Spotted Footman sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Four-Spotted Footman is recorded against all the insects logged in Triglav National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.