What are the chances of seeing a Common Jezebel in Udawalawe National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Common Jezebel sighting in Udawalawe National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 3rd most-seen of the 12 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common Jezebel in Udawalawe National Park?
August
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Common Jezebel in Udawalawe National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–March, July and September, the lowest months. That is one of Udawalawe National Park's driest months, with about 70 mm of rain against 330 mm in November.
What time of day is best to see a Common Jezebel?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common Jezebel sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Udawalawe National Park the best place to see a Common Jezebel?
Yes
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Common Jezebel sightings, Udawalawe National Park has the highest daily chance: about 30%. Next come Wilpattu National Park (Sri Lanka, about 20%) and Satpura National Park (India, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Common Jezebel live in Udawalawe National Park?
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Common Jezebel that you can see in Udawalawe National Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Common Crow (about 40%), Blue Tiger (about 30%) and Lesser Grass Blue (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common Jezebel sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common Jezebel is recorded against all the insects logged in Udawalawe National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.