What are the chances of seeing a Rufous-tailed Tailorbird in Way Kambas National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-tailed Tailorbird sighting in Way Kambas National Park on a given day, based on 103 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 24th most-seen of the 205 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous-tailed Tailorbird in Way Kambas National Park?
October
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-tailed Tailorbird in Way Kambas National Park on a given day, against about 20% in September, the lowest month. November to February have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous-tailed Tailorbird?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous-tailed Tailorbird sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Way Kambas National Park the best place to see a Rufous-tailed Tailorbird?
2nd of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Rufous-tailed Tailorbird sightings, Way Kambas National Park ranks 2nd at about 40%. The best odds are in Bako National Park (Malaysia, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Rufous-tailed Tailorbird live in Way Kambas National Park?
Same genus: Orthotomus
The closest relatives of the Rufous-tailed Tailorbird that you can see in Way Kambas National Park (genus Orthotomus, Typical Tailorbirds) are Ashy Tailorbird (about 50%) and Dark-necked Tailorbird (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous-tailed Tailorbird sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous-tailed Tailorbird is recorded against all the birds logged in Way Kambas National Park (103 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.