What are the chances of seeing a Blue-faced Malkoha in Wilpattu National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-faced Malkoha sighting in Wilpattu National Park on a given day, based on 125 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 67th most-seen of the 169 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-faced Malkoha in Wilpattu National Park?
October
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-faced Malkoha in Wilpattu National Park on a given day, against about 10% in May, the lowest month. That is one of Wilpattu National Park's wettest months, with about 260 mm of rain against 40 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-faced Malkoha?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-faced Malkoha sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Wilpattu National Park the best place to see a Blue-faced Malkoha?
3rd of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Blue-faced Malkoha sightings, Wilpattu National Park ranks 3rd at about 30%. The best odds are in Udawalawe National Park (Sri Lanka, about 50%) and Yala National Park (Sri Lanka, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Blue-faced Malkoha live in Wilpattu National Park?
Same family: Cuculidae
The closest relatives of the Blue-faced Malkoha that you can see in Wilpattu National Park (family Cuculidae, Cuckoos) are Greater Coucal (about 40%), Asian Koel (about 20%) and Asian Drongo-Cuckoo (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-faced Malkoha sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-faced Malkoha is recorded against all the birds logged in Wilpattu National Park (125 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.