What are the chances of seeing a Chestnut-winged Hookbill in Yasuní National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-winged Hookbill sighting in Yasuní National Park on a given day, based on 56 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 361st most-seen of the 533 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Chestnut-winged Hookbill in Yasuní National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Chestnut-winged Hookbill in Yasuní National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Chestnut-winged Hookbill?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Chestnut-winged Hookbill sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Yasuní National Park the best place to see a Chestnut-winged Hookbill?
3rd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Chestnut-winged Hookbill sightings, Yasuní National Park ranks 3rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, about 10%) and Manu National Park (Peru, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Chestnut-winged Hookbill live in Yasuní National Park?
Same family: Furnariidae
The closest relatives of the Chestnut-winged Hookbill that you can see in Yasuní National Park (family Furnariidae, Ovenbirds and Woodcreepers) are Buff-throated Woodcreeper (about 30%), Cinnamon-throated Woodcreeper (about 10%) and Striped Woodcreeper (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Chestnut-winged Hookbill sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Chestnut-winged Hookbill is recorded against all the birds logged in Yasuní National Park (56 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.