What are the chances of seeing a Slender-billed Weaver in Akagera National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Slender-billed Weaver sighting in Akagera National Park on a given day, based on 34 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 184th most-seen of the 320 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Slender-billed Weaver in Akagera National Park?
December
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Slender-billed Weaver in Akagera National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–June, August–September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Slender-billed Weaver?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Slender-billed Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Akagera National Park the best place to see a Slender-billed Weaver?
4th of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Slender-billed Weaver sightings, Akagera National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Queen Elizabeth National Park (Uganda, about 30%), Virunga National Park (Democratic Republic of the Congo, about 10%) and Murchison Falls National Park (Uganda, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Slender-billed Weaver live in Akagera National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Slender-billed Weaver that you can see in Akagera National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Village Weaver (about 50%), Holub's Golden-Weaver (about 20%) and Black-headed Weaver (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Slender-billed Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Slender-billed Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Akagera National Park (34 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.