What are the chances of seeing a Holub's Golden-Weaver in Akagera National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Holub's Golden-Weaver sighting in Akagera National Park on a given day, based on 82 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 113th most-seen of the 320 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Holub's Golden-Weaver in Akagera National Park?
December
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Holub's Golden-Weaver in Akagera National Park on a given day, against about 10% in February–March, May–June and August–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Holub's Golden-Weaver?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Holub's Golden-Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Akagera National Park the best place to see a Holub's Golden-Weaver?
Among the best
Of the 24 parks where we can rate Holub's Golden-Weaver sightings, Akagera National Park ranks 3rd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Lake Mburo National Park (Uganda, about 20%) and Nairobi National Park (Kenya, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Holub's Golden-Weaver live in Akagera National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Holub's Golden-Weaver that you can see in Akagera National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Village Weaver (about 50%), Black-headed Weaver (about 10%) and Lesser Masked-Weaver (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Holub's Golden-Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Holub's Golden-Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Akagera National Park (82 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.