What are the chances of seeing a Baglafecht Weaver in Akagera National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Baglafecht Weaver sighting in Akagera National Park on a given day, based on 38 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 173rd most-seen of the 320 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Baglafecht Weaver in Akagera National Park?
December
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Baglafecht Weaver in Akagera National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–April, June, August–September and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Baglafecht Weaver?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Baglafecht Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Akagera National Park the best place to see a Baglafecht Weaver?
15th of 22
Of the 22 parks where we can rate Baglafecht Weaver sightings, Akagera National Park ranks 15th at about 10%. The best odds are in Aberdare National Park (Kenya, about 60%), Volcanoes National Park (Rwanda, about 60%) and Bale Mountains National Park (Ethiopia, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Baglafecht Weaver live in Akagera National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Baglafecht Weaver that you can see in Akagera National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Village Weaver (about 50%), Holub's Golden-Weaver (about 20%) and Black-headed Weaver (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Baglafecht Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Baglafecht Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Akagera National Park (38 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.