What are the chances of seeing an African Golden-Weaver in Amboseli National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an African Golden-Weaver sighting in Amboseli National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 339th most-seen of the 362 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an African Golden-Weaver in Amboseli National Park?
January
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report an African Golden-Weaver in Amboseli National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an African Golden-Weaver?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most African Golden-Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Amboseli National Park the best place to see an African Golden-Weaver?
9th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate African Golden-Weaver sightings, Amboseli National Park ranks 9th at under 5%. The best odds are in iSimangaliso Wetland Park (South Africa, about 40%), uMkhuze Game Reserve (South Africa, about 20%) and Tsavo East National Park (Kenya, about 10%).
Which relatives of the African Golden-Weaver live in Amboseli National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the African Golden-Weaver that you can see in Amboseli National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Taveta Golden-Weaver (about 30%), Lesser Masked-Weaver (about 10%) and Chestnut Weaver (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the African Golden-Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the African Golden-Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Amboseli National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.