What are the chances of seeing a Baglafecht Weaver in Amboseli National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Baglafecht Weaver sighting in Amboseli National Park on a given day, based on 39 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 207th most-seen of the 362 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Baglafecht Weaver in Amboseli National Park?
June–July and December–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Baglafecht Weaver in Amboseli National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–May and August–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Baglafecht Weaver?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Baglafecht Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Amboseli National Park the best place to see a Baglafecht Weaver?
17th of 22
Of the 22 parks where we can rate Baglafecht Weaver sightings, Amboseli National Park ranks 17th at under 5%. The best odds are in Aberdare National Park (Kenya, about 60%), Volcanoes National Park (Rwanda, about 60%) and Bale Mountains National Park (Ethiopia, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Baglafecht Weaver live in Amboseli National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Baglafecht Weaver that you can see in Amboseli National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Taveta Golden-Weaver (about 30%), Lesser Masked-Weaver (about 10%) and Chestnut Weaver (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Baglafecht Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Baglafecht Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Amboseli National Park (39 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.