What are the chances of seeing a Vitelline Masked-Weaver in Amboseli National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Vitelline Masked-Weaver sighting in Amboseli National Park on a given day, based on 78 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 167th most-seen of the 362 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Vitelline Masked-Weaver in Amboseli National Park?
May–August and November–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Vitelline Masked-Weaver in Amboseli National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–April and September–October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Vitelline Masked-Weaver?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Vitelline Masked-Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Amboseli National Park the best place to see a Vitelline Masked-Weaver?
10th of 17
Of the 17 parks where we can rate Vitelline Masked-Weaver sightings, Amboseli National Park ranks 10th at about 10%. The best odds are in Mkomazi National Park (Tanzania, about 30%), Lake Manyara National Park (Tanzania, about 20%) and Ngorongoro Conservation Area (Tanzania, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Vitelline Masked-Weaver live in Amboseli National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Vitelline Masked-Weaver that you can see in Amboseli National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Taveta Golden-Weaver (about 30%), Lesser Masked-Weaver (about 10%) and Chestnut Weaver (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Vitelline Masked-Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Vitelline Masked-Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Amboseli National Park (78 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.